SPDX Statistics - Peek Edition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hot news:

- Many times I had to open PR and convert the license tag for package despite the fact that I already converted it previously. That is because a maintainer keeps the spec file somewehere else (in upstream) and on release just copy it to dist-git. If this is your workflow please sync upstream with Fedora's dist-git first.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_spec_maintenance_and_canonicity 

- The remaining packages usually contains either Public Domain or some variant of Redistributable. The conversion is slow. If you want to help with these, here are guidelines: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/update-existing-packages/#_public_domain


Two weeks ago we had:

* 24426 spec files in Fedora

* 31052 license tags in all spec files

* 5918 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet

* 181 tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx`

* Progress: 81,11% ░░░░░ 100%

ELN subset:

140 out of 2325 packages are not converted yet (progress 93.98%)


Today we have:

* 24378 spec files in Fedora

* 31014 license tags in all spec files

* 5359 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet

* 149 tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx`

* Progress: 82,72% ░░░░░ 100%

ELN subset:

71 out of 2320 packages are not converted yet (progress 96.94%)

Graph of these data with the burndown chart:

   https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QVMEzXWML-6_Mrlln02axFAaRKCQ8zE807rpCjus-8s/edit?usp=sharing

The list of packages needed to be converted is here:

    https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final.txt

List by package maintainers is here

   https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final-maintainers.txt

Packages that are neither in SPDX nor in Callaway format (highest priority for now) - 101 packages:

https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/neither-nor-remaining-packagers.txt

New version of fedora-license-data has been released. With:

    4 new licenses and several public domain or ultrapermissive dedications
    7 licenses are waiting to be reviewed by SPDX.org (and then to be added to fedora-license-data) https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/?label_name%5B%5D=SPDX%3A%3Ablocked

Legal docs and especially

  https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/allowed-licenses/

was updated too.

New projection when we will be finished is 2025-03-29 (+2 days from last report).  Pure linear approximation.
If your package does not have neither git-log entry nor spec-changelog entry mentioning SPDX and you know your license tag matches SPDX formula, you can put your package on ignore list

  https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/ignore-packages.txt

Either pull-request or direct email to me is fine.


Why Peek Edition? Becase on today's date in 1951, Kim Peek was born. He was inspiration for the movie Rain Man. And his true story and live is as good too.
Here is start of the today's rabbit hole: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Peek

Miroslav


-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux