Re: strawman proposal: homed directories for users

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 9:22 AM Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 7 2024 at 12:59:46 PM -04:00:00, Simo Sorce
> <simo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Changing a default like this is not something to do lightly IMHO.
>
> I'm interested in systemd-homed because we currently have no other
> plausible path towards encryption of user data by default [1] (since
> use of LUKS full-disk encryption has been rejected).
>
> [1] https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/82
>

And that's the context in which we wanted homed working with
centralized logins. It continues to confuse me that people conflate
"centralized login provider" with "remote users", which are not the
same thing at all. Local users that have primary
authentication/authorization externally managed has been a pattern for
quite a long time on other platforms.


-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux