On Sa, 05.10.24 05:50, Neal Gompa (ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > So from my point of view, homed *should not* be incompatible with this > > > use-case, even though it currently is. > > > > I would just use normal users for that case. This functionality is > > not going away and there would be no benefit from somehow shoehorning > > remotely-defined users into systemd-homed. > > There is: automatic encryption of user data, and tying the user-data > decryption to central login credentials. I think you want homed to be something it really isn't. It's about locally managed stuff, not about networked accounts. If you want networked stuff, thta's fine, then use sssd, but this really doesn't need to take place like this within the homed framework really. > The whole reason we explored homed was for that, and there is very > little benefit to doing any integration work for homed if we can't > universally reap the benefits of it. Well, that's a bit like saying we shouldn't adopt mysql because it is a shit web browser, no? I mean, it's true, mysql *is* a shit web browser, but it's not really what mysql is supposed to be, no? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Berlin -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
