On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 01:20:40PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > It's fairly normal these days that the users are self-contained and > otherwise local, *except* for login credentials. This use-case is > important to support because this is pretty much how business laptops > need to work. > > In the long past, the dichotomy was clearer: you either had local > users with local storage, or centrally managed users with remote > storage. But nowadays it's always local storage, just with either > local authentication or remote authentication. This also includes > being able to cache remote authentication records (e.g. SSSD) for > brief offline periods for logging in anyway. > > So from my point of view, homed *should not* be incompatible with this > use-case, even though it currently is. I would just use normal users for that case. This functionality is not going away and there would be no benefit from somehow shoehorning remotely-defined users into systemd-homed. Zbyszek -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
