Re: Zlib-ng rebase from 2.1.* to 2.2.* version

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> For the record, I don't think a Change proposal for a relatively
> "minor" (pun intended) update like is necessary.
> But if you want to go through the Change Process (for example, to make
> this change more visible / public), then that's fine too.

We were unsure if this was necessary, considering that 1200+ packages
build requires zlib-ng.
In the end, it doesn't hurt to go through the change process and raise
awareness for this change.

Thanks!

-- 
Tulio Magno
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux