Hi, we have two packages python-docopt and python-docopt-ng and they declare Conflicts. This is reasonable: they don't actually conflict at the file level, but because they both provide the docopt module, it could be unclear which one is loaded. Unfortunately some dependent packages switched to the new dep, but not all, so during upgrades and installs dnf becomes quite unhappy: Problem: conflicting requests - package python3-kiwi-10.1.13-1.fc41.noarch from updates-testing requires python3.13dist(docopt-ng) >= 0.9, but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package - installed package python3-docopt-1:0.6.2-3.fc41.noarch conflicts with python3-docopt provided by python3-docopt-ng-0.9.0-4.fc41.noarch from fedora ... $ fedrq wr -F name -s python3-docopt liquidctl python-bioread python-doxytag2zealdb python-grip python-hdfs python-jedi python-num2words python-odml python-parso python-pykwalify python-vconnector python-vevents python-vpoller stomppy udiskie $ fedrq wr -F name -s python3-docopt-ng kiwi kiwi-boxed-plugin Dunno, those package that require python3-docopt are not very widely installed, but a conflict like this is quite annoying. (And very confusing to users if they encounter this somewhere in the dependency chain.) Should we switch kiwi to use python3-docopt for now? Zbyszek -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
