On Fri, 2024-09-27 at 13:13 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Hi all, > > It's that time of the year again - pointing out packages that are at > a > lower version in Fedora 41 (branched) than Fedora 40 (stable). > For those that are just obviously missing unintentionally, I plan to > submit the missing builds and bodhi updates later today. > In https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/new if you search for fc41 you will see a huge list of packages, the problem is some packages can be to not update , can be old builds and others things > As for those updates that are handled by packit and which are missing > Rawhide and / or Fedora 41 builds -- not sure what can be done here, > but packit should be better than that. > > Fabio > > ===================================================================== > =========== > > Here's the list of downgrades (ignoring Release): > > Downgraded packages: (20) > - calls-0:47.0-1.fc40 > calls-0:47~beta.0-1.fc41 > > This was updated on Fedora 40 and in Rawhide, 41 was missed. > > - chordpro-0:6.060-2.fc40 > chordpro-0:6.050-4.fc41 > > This was updated on Fedora 40, 39, and in Rawhide, 41 was missed. > > - fluent-bit-0:3.0.4-1.fc40 > fluent-bit-0:2.2.2-1.fc41 > > Looks like this one was missed for Fedora 41 and Rawhide, not sure > why. > The Mass Rebuild build failed too, but koschei is green now. > > - gedit-control-your-tabs-0:0.4.1-1.fc40 > > gedit-control-your-tabs-0:0.4.0-7.fc40 > > Looks like this one fails to build on Fedora 41+. > > - gimp3-0:2.99.19^20240916gitca9d57a417-1.fc40 > > gimp3-0:2.99.19^20240824git74bbe26918-2.fc41 > > Looks like Fedora 41 has an older snapshot. > The package was retired in Rawhide, but not in Fedora 41, so the fact > that it's still in Fedora 41 is likely unintentional. > > - haruna-0:1.2.0-1.fc40 > haruna-0:1.1.2-3.fc41 > > This one was built for Fedora Rawhide and 40, but not 41. > Should get fixed when / if the ffmpeg 7 rebuild lands. > > - keycloak-httpd-client-install-0:1.3-1.fc40 > > keycloak-httpd-client-install-0:1.1-23.fc41 > > Looks like the 1.3 update was pushed to the f41 branch in dist-git, > but never built. > > - matrix-synapse-0:1.111.1-1.fc40 > matrix-synapse-0:1.110.0-2.fc41 > > There's newer versions in Rawhide and F40, but not built for F41. Not > sure why. > > - mrack-0:1.19.0-1.fc40 > mrack-0:1.18.0-5.fc41 > > Here, packit didn't submit updates for Fedora Rawhide and 41. > > - nest-0:3.8-1.fc40 > nest-0:3.7-5.fc41 > > Package was updated to 3.8 on Rawhide, Fedora 40, and 39, but Fedora > 41 was missed. > > - nwchem-0:7.2.3-1.fc40 > nwchem-0:7.2.2-7.fc41 > > Package was updated to 7.2.3 on Rawhide, Fedora 40, and 39, but > Fedora > 41 was missed. > > - phosh-0:0.41.1-1.fc40 > phosh-0:0.41.0-5.fc41 > > Package was updated to 0.41.1 on Rawhide and Fedora 40, but Fedora 41 > was missed. > > - picard-0:2.12.1-1.fc40 > picard-0:2.12.0-4.fc41 > > There *is* an update of 2.12.1 for Fedora 41, but it's not tagged > correctly: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-95f1285d8f > > - python-rstcheck-core-0:1.2.1-1.fc40 > python-rstcheck-core-0:1.1.1- > 5.fc41 > > This one was updated to 1.2.1 only on Fedora 40, not Rawhide or > Fedora 41. > > - qm-0:0.6.7-1.fc40 > qm-0:0.6.4-2.fc41 > > Another packit victim. Updates were pushed for Rawhide, Fedora 40, > 39, > and EPEL 9, but not Fedora 41. > > - renderdoc-0:1.34-1.fc40 > renderdoc-0:1.33-3.fc41 > > Package was updated to 1.34 on Rawhide and Fedora 40, but Fedora 41 > was missed. > > - samba-2:4.20.5-1.fc40 > samba-2:4.20.4-1.fc41 > > This update is stuck in "pending" on Fedora 41, looks like the builds > are not getting signed: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-e331cd53ac > > - sdrangel-0:7.22.0-1.fc40 > sdrangel-0:7.21.4-4.fc41 > > This one was updated to 7.22.0 only on Fedora 40 and 39, not Rawhide > or Fedora 41. > > - shapelib-0:1.6.1-1.fc40 > shapelib-0:1.6.0-3.fc41 > > Package was updated to 1.6.1 on Rawhide and Fedora 40, but Fedora 41 > was missed. > > - tipcutils-0:3.0.6-1.fc40 > tipcutils-0:3.0.4-11.fc41 > > Package was updated to 3.0.6 on Rawhide, Fedora 40, 39, and EPEL 9, > but Fedora 41 was missed. -- Sérgio M. B. -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
