I will start with the tidbit first today. Why "Almost There
Edition"? You can find that in
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QVMEzXWML-6_Mrlln02axFAaRKCQ8zE807rpCjus-8s/edit?gid=0#gid=0
we are done from 81%. But I will offer different view: 5970 packages are not converted yet. But out of this number: 2387 packages are migrated to LicenseRef-Callaway-* and are technically in SPDX form, 3025 packages are valid SPDX formulas and validate using license-validate, but there is no entry if it was checked (MIT cases). That leaves us with only 558 packages that does not have valid SPDX license string. Last 2% percents! We are almost there!
We have 168 packages that have licenses does not license neither
valid as Callaway nor SPDX.
https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/neither-nor-remaining.txt
https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/neither-nor-remaining-packagers.txt
I am going through of them. And for about half of them I already
opened PR that correct the license or filed BZ describing the
problem. I created tracking BZ for these cases
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2310597
When I finish with these I want to follow on the last 188 trivial
migration. Most of them are Public Domain "licenses" that needs to
add the dedication to
https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/blob/main/public-domain-text.txt?ref_type=heads
Two weeks ago we had:
* 24320 spec files in Fedora
* 30938 license tags in all spec files
* 6416 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet
* 228 tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx`
* Progress: 79,26% ░░░░░░░███ 100%
ELN subset:
154 out of 1955 packages are not converted yet (progress 92.12%)
Today we have:
* 24376 spec files in Fedora
* 31002 license tags in all spec files
* 5970 tags have not been
converted to SPDX yet
* 188 tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx`
*
Progress: 81,24% ░░░░░░░░██
100%
ELN subset:
142
out of 2322 packages are not converted yet
(progress 93.88%)
Graph of these data with the burndown chart:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QVMEzXWML-6_Mrlln02axFAaRKCQ8zE807rpCjus-8s/edit?usp=sharing
https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final.txt
List by package maintainers is here
https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final-maintainers.txt
4 new licenses
7 licenses are waiting to be reviewed by SPDX.org (and then to
be added to fedora-license-data) https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/?label_name%5B%5D=SPDX%3A%3Ablocked
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/allowed-licenses/
was updated too.
If your package does not have neither git-log entry nor spec-changelog entry mentioning SPDX and you know your license tag matches SPDX formula, you can put your package on ignore list
https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/ignore-packages.txt
Either pull-request or direct
email to me is fine.
Miroslav
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue