Re: [SPDX] packages that are "not valid neither as Callaway nor as SPDX"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 02:03:20PM GMT, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 06. 09. 24 v 1:33 odp. Ben Beasley napsal(a):
> > Both python-graph-tool and python-llvmlite also use the %{shrink: …}
> > macro in their spec files. You’ve demonstrated how they can be validated
> > correctly by first allowing RPM to form the License expression in a
> > single line, rather than grepping the spec file directly.
> 
> Yes. The same issue as Ben and Petr. Fixed now and will not be reported again.

Can you do a updated run so we can see how many are left after that
change?

Thanks!

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux