Re: [SPDX] packages that are "not valid neither as Callaway nor as SPDX"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 10:49:07 GMT, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> python-llvmlite      ankursinha

This one also looks fine:

> $ rpmspec -P python-llvmlite.spec | grep "^License"
> License:        BSD-2-Clause AND Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception AND LicenseRef-Fedora-Public-Domain
> $ license-validate "BSD-2-Clause AND Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception AND LicenseRef-Fedora-Public-Domain"
> # no output


Again, am I checking these wrong?

-- 
Thanks again,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux