Re: [SPDX] packages that are "not valid neither as Callaway nor as SPDX"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 06. 09. 24 v 12:55 odp. Artur Frenszek-Iwicki napsal(a):
Bah, silly mistake on my part. This was "LGPLv2+", so should be "LGPL-2.0-or-later".

Yes. You are not alone. There is lot of such typos.

But there is another problem.

  LGPL-2.0-or-later
is allowed license, but
  LGPL-2.0-or-later WITH Classpath-exception-2.0
is not allowed. Simply because it is not on Fedora list (while it is valid SPDX formula).
Can you please file an issue for this combination at
  https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data
?


--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys

--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux