Re: SPDX Statistics - Gold Rush Edition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 8:44 PM Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> At some point we added a rule,
>
> “A license should normally appear only once in the License: tag license expression. But if the license expression includes an OR sub-expression, that OR sub-expression is treated as though it were a single license for purposes of this rule. *****As an exception to this rule, if all the license operands of the OR sub-expression also appear in the license expression outside the OR sub-expression, then you can eliminate the OR sub-expression.*****”
>
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-field/#_special_rules_for_or_expressions

I read this page yesterday, and I remember neither the part on not
simplifying mentioned by Miroslav nor the exception you just brought
up. I suspect that this page only left a residual "hunch" that I
should keep the literal expression.

> I don’t like this rule, because:
>
> - I don’t like the cognitive burden on packagers of adding another step away from pure, straightforward mechanical enumeration of licenses

The other cognitive burden is the itch to always simplify any boolean
expression that looks suboptimal :p

> - I believe the simplification discards useful information

That is how I felt about the dual licensing of one of the js scripts.

> - I think it’s not clear exactly how it should be interpreted in complicated, possibly nested SPDX expressions
>
> Nevertheless, this rule would appear to specifically allow the simplification you described.

I guess your answer to my questions is that both are valid, but the
one I picked is preferred.

Thank you and Miroslav for the quick turnaround!

Dridi
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux