Dne 17. 08. 24 v 8:02 odp. Dridi
Boukelmoune napsal(a):
I ended up with the following license tag that I moved to SPDX as part
of the incoming update:
License: GPL-2.0-only AND MIT AND (GPL-2.0-only OR MIT)
I feel like I could technically factor it to just "GPL-2.0-only AND
MIT" because picking either license in the dual-licensed js script
will effectively result in just that, but I kept the expanded license
tag to reflect the presence of a dual-licensed piece of software (and
because I saw nothing resembling this case in the guidelines).
What is the preferred _expression_ here? Are they both correct?
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-field/#_no_effective_license_analysis
"you should not attempt to simplify or reduce the License tag"
So full license _expression_ is correct. I.e.
GPL-2.0-only AND MIT AND (GPL-2.0-only OR MIT)
in your case.
-- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
