On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 9:12 AM Matthew Krupcale <mkrupcale@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 10:59 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 7:09 AM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 5:32 AM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 4:49 AM Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2024, 10:28 Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Hey all,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> pkgconf 2.3.0 just released and the jump from 2.1.1 to 2.3.0 brings
> > > > >> with us a soname bump. I will be updating pkgconf and rebuilding
> > > > >> dependents in a side-tag, and hopefully get everything done later
> > > > >> today.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The identified packages are:
> > > > >> * build2
> > > > >> * perl-PkgConfig-LibPkgConf
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I identified them with the following commands:
> > > > >> * dnf rq --qf "%{SOURCERPM}" --whatrequires "libpkgconf.so.4()(64bit)"
> > > > >> * dnf rq --qf "%{SOURCERPM}" --whatrequires "libpkgconf"
> > > > >>
> > > > >> If there are any I missed, please let me know and I will add it to my
> > > > >> list of packages to build.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I might be misremembering, but weren't odd-numbered minor releases "unstable" and shouldn't be packaged because they might break ABI? Which was a problem with 2.1 when we added that version?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > No, the soname bump happened in 2.2.0. We're just getting it now
> > > > because I'm upgrading to 2.3.0. Only GNOME libraries follow that
> > > > convention of breaking things on odd number versions.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
> > >
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > I've been able to take care of everything except build2, and I'm not
> > > sure why it's broken. Could someone take a look at it and submit it to
> > > f41-build-side-93739?
> > >
> > > Here's the task: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=121891824
> > >
> >
> > Another ping to request for help with build2. It's not building
> > properly and if it isn't able to get fixed in the next couple of days,
> > I will merge the side-tag without it and it will need to be fixed
> > independently.
>
> Hey Neal,
>
> Sorry I missed this. Go ahead and merge the side tag. Upstream build2
> upstream now bundles a forked version of pkgconf [1, 2], and I just
> need to update to the latest version still. I'll try and finish that
> this weekend.
>
> Best,
> Matthew
>
> [1] https://github.com/build2/build2/issues/381#issuecomment-2099699208
> [2] https://lists.build2.org/archives/users/2024-June/001117.html
>
Alright, this is done now.
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
