On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 4:49 AM Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2024, 10:28 Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> pkgconf 2.3.0 just released and the jump from 2.1.1 to 2.3.0 brings
>> with us a soname bump. I will be updating pkgconf and rebuilding
>> dependents in a side-tag, and hopefully get everything done later
>> today.
>>
>> The identified packages are:
>> * build2
>> * perl-PkgConfig-LibPkgConf
>>
>> I identified them with the following commands:
>> * dnf rq --qf "%{SOURCERPM}" --whatrequires "libpkgconf.so.4()(64bit)"
>> * dnf rq --qf "%{SOURCERPM}" --whatrequires "libpkgconf"
>>
>> If there are any I missed, please let me know and I will add it to my
>> list of packages to build.
>
>
> I might be misremembering, but weren't odd-numbered minor releases "unstable" and shouldn't be packaged because they might break ABI? Which was a problem with 2.1 when we added that version?
>
No, the soname bump happened in 2.2.0. We're just getting it now
because I'm upgrading to 2.3.0. Only GNOME libraries follow that
convention of breaking things on odd number versions.
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
