3) I first thought that this: atril
- GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ and MIT
+ GPL-2.0-or-later AND License-Callaway-LGPLv2+ AND License-Callaway-MITneeds different handling, but then I realized it is likely what we want. It converts GPLv2+ to only possible form: GPL-2.0-or-later.
LGPLv2+ has more options: ['LGPL-2.0-or-later', 'LGPL-2.1-or-later'], therefore the only way is to convert it to License-Callaway-LGPLv2+.
Argh, wrong keys and I sent this email prematurely. I wanted to follow:
It converts GPLv2+ to only possible form: GPL-2.0-or-later.
LGPLv2+ has more options: ['LGPL-2.0-or-later',
'LGPL-2.1-or-later'], therefore the only way is to convert it to
License-Callaway-LGPLv2+.
But what to do with MIT. MIT is already in SPDX. But in Callaway
form too. And because the whole formula contains old Callaway ids,
we can assume the MIT is old Callaway "MIT". And that can be
converted to:
['Adobe-Glyph',
'BSL-1.0', 'Boehm-GC', 'HP-1986', 'HPND-sell-variant'
, 'HPND', 'ICU', 'MIT-CMU', 'MIT-Festival',
'MIT-Modern-Variant', 'MIT-enna', 'MIT-feh', 'MIT-open-group',
'MIT', 'NTP', 'SGI-B-2.0',
'SMLNJ', 'UnixCrypt', 'Xfig', 'libtiff', 'mpich2']
And we do not know what to use. So only safe option is to
convert it to License-Callaway-MIT.
If you spot any other issue in the diff, let me know.
I am leaving for holiday tomorrow, I will try to address your
feedback after a week.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
