Hi
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302033. The source of
the issue is that the Requires: environment(modules) in rpm-mpi-hooks
(which is a BuildRequirement of openmpi/mpich) did not result in
environment-modules getting installed, which broke the dependency
generation by rpm-mpi-hooks. I've worked around this by explicitly
specifying Requires: environment-modules in rpm-mpi-hooks, and have now
rebuilt openmpi. This should solve the broken dependencies. I haven't
investigated the failure in resolving "Requires: environment(modules)",
which I suspect might be a dnf5 issue.
Sandro
On 31.07.24 16:30, Sandro via devel wrote:
Hi,
It seems something is going on with RPM metadata generation.
With the latest update of openmpi the generated metadata has changed:
$ rpm -q --provides -p openmpi-5.0.5-1.fc41.x86_64.rpm
config(openmpi) = 5.0.5-1.fc41
libmpi.so.40()(64bit)
libmpi_java.so.40()(64bit)
libmpi_mpifh.so.40()(64bit)
libmpi_usempi_ignore_tkr.so.40()(64bit)
libmpi_usempif08.so.40()(64bit)
liboshmem.so.40()(64bit)
mpi
openmpi = 5.0.5-1.fc41
openmpi(x86-64) = 5.0.5-1.fc41
The previous build (during mass rebuild) had:
$ rpm -q --provides -p openmpi-5.0.3-3.fc41.x86_64.rpm
config(openmpi) = 5.0.3-3.fc41
libmpi.so.40()(64bit)(openmpi-x86_64)
libmpi_java.so.40()(64bit)(openmpi-x86_64)
libmpi_mpifh.so.40()(64bit)(openmpi-x86_64)
libmpi_usempi_ignore_tkr.so.40()(64bit)(openmpi-x86_64)
libmpi_usempif08.so.40()(64bit)(openmpi-x86_64)
liboshmem.so.40()(64bit)(openmpi-x86_64)
mpi
openmpi = 5.0.3-3.fc41
openmpi(x86-64) = 5.0.3-3.fc41
The `(openmpi-x86_64)` part has been dropped, causing packages
depending on OpenMPI to go FTI with a message like:
can't install sandia-omega-h-openmpi:
- nothing provides libmpi.so.40()(64bit)(openmpi-x86_64) needed by
sandia-omega-h-openmpi-9.34.13-7.fc41.x86_64
I quick glance didn't show any changes to the rpm package between the
two builds, suggesting something else is causing the issue. I'm at a
loss as to where this issue needs to be reported and fixed.
To make things even more complicated, my latest scratch build of
5.0.5-1 has the correct metadata just like the 5.0.3-3 build.
5.0.5-1 (broken):
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2519082
5.0.3-3 (good):
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2499148
5.0.5-1 (good):
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=121299407
Cheers,
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
