On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 10:38 PM Kevin Kofler via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > And this one is yet another case of FESCo rubberstamping a change without > even any dissenting vote despite loads of negative mailing list feedback. How can one determine "loads"? Since the feedback itself is opt-in, no statistically valid conclusion can be reached based on the feedback received(*). FESCo needs to review the feedback that was received, and use their best judgement as to whether to approve or disapprove, and no one should expect there to be a dissenting vote just because of negative feedback. (*) And in addition, there is lots of cases where only those with negative feedback will decide to "opt-in" to offer an opinion, as they are motivated. -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
