Re: [Java related] packaging Italian ID card middleware

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



V Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 12:15:39PM +0200, Julian Sikorski napsal(a):
> Am 22.07.24 um 22:53 schrieb Kevin Kofler via devel:
> > Julian Sikorski wrote:
> > > Germany uses their own implementation too:
> > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/AusweisApp2
> > > To add insult to injury, it requires the use of custom EC curves, which
> > > are bound to stop working at any moment:
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259403
> > 
> > At which point you should probably just bundle a static OpenSSL with
> > AusweisApp2. As unfortunate as it is, there appears to be little other
> > choice to keep the package running here, and bundling forked libraries is no
> > longer against Fedora packaging guidelines. And there are other packages
> > already bundling forked versions of OpenSSL (e.g., Chromium and derivatives
> > all bundle some version of "BoringSSL").
> 
> Well so far it is working, let's hope it stays this way as long as possible.
> If upstream drops legacy OpenSSL API support or using it no longer helps, I
> am probably going to orphan the package. There is a flatpak which seems to
> be maintained by one of the upstream developers. Bundling a
> security-critical library in a package used for ID verification is not
> something I would be willing to take on.
> 
> > 
> > And at least the German stuff (and the Italian, Portuguese, and Estonian
> > ones) is Free Software. The Austrian ID Austria app is entirely proprietary.
> > Though, as far as I know, you can buy physical FIDO2 hardware, then go
> > register that with the ID Austria office, and then log in on the ID Austria
> > website with any FIDO2 enabled browser and the hardware you bought. But the
> > default workflow goes through a proprietary smartphone app.
> 
> Definitely. Polish ID software is closed source too and from the brief look
> was even allegedly violating LGPL at some point.
> 
Slovak ID is also proprietary. Someone reverse engineered it, merged the
implementation into OpenSC and got sued by the vendor
<https://sourceforge.net/p/opensc/mailman/message/37885400/>.

-- Petr

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux