On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 07:09:18PM +0800, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 7:02 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < > zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 09:49:36PM +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote: > > > Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/fedora-repoquery_tool > > > Discussion Thread - > > > > > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f41-change-proposal-fedora-repoquery-tool-self-contained/126066 > > : > > > Oh, fedrq vs. fdrq. I expect that this is going to cause endless > > confusion. People will think it's a typo, not a separate project. > > (I just read this text, looked at the review request, and I > > immediately wanted to ask why 'fedora-repoquery' creates a symlink as > > 'fdrq', won't that conflict with the existing package? But of course > > it doesn't.) > > > > Did you consider giving it some completely different name? > > > > Thanks, I am thinking... there have already been some related comments in > Discourse. Oh, I didn't look there. I see now. > People can use the long alias "fedora-repoquery" of course. > I would like to have a short name too though: since the long name is far > too long for me. > I am open to ideas/suggestions I suppose. > > Today I thought "frq" might be a more distinct name than fdrq. I agree with the comments on discourse: not better ;) Maybe take a leaf out of dracut's and wayland's book and just invent a random name or use the name of a place you like? Zbyszek -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
