On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 7:02 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 09:49:36PM +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/fedora-repoquery_tool
> Discussion Thread -
> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f41-change-proposal-fedora-repoquery-tool-self-contained/126066
:
Oh, fedrq vs. fdrq. I expect that this is going to cause endless
confusion. People will think it's a typo, not a separate project.
(I just read this text, looked at the review request, and I
immediately wanted to ask why 'fedora-repoquery' creates a symlink as
'fdrq', won't that conflict with the existing package? But of course
it doesn't.)
Did you consider giving it some completely different name?
Thanks, I am thinking... there have already been some related comments in Discourse.
People can use the long alias "fedora-repoquery" of course.
I would like to have a short name too though: since the long name is far too long for me.
I am open to ideas/suggestions I suppose.
Today I thought "frq" might be a more distinct name than fdrq.
Jens
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
