Re: SquashFS?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 08:20:00PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> We're working on a kernel-module-standard for fedora-extras. I can
> package unionfs and SqashFS then if that would be enough for the LiveCD.
> But there might be a small problem with SqashFS and the initrd:

A kernel-module-standard is a necessity for fedora-extras but not for
unionfs/squashfs, IMO. They're small, and can be compiled on-the-fly,
when creating the live cd iso.

And I don't think the lack of support for a "squashed" initrd is a
problem. I believe initramfs works much better for livecds, anyway. :)

BTW, I'll gladly help if there's anything I can do.

-- 
lfr
0/0

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux