Re: SquashFS?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 08:03:16PM +0200, Darko Ilic wrote:
> 
> Well, having unionfs included in the kernel would be *great* for live CDs. 
> 
> If we could push both unionfs and SquashFS to go upstream, that would improve 
> the quality of live CDs dramatically. 

To have unionfs and squashfs upstream would be nice, yes. But they can
be used regardless of being upstream or not.

-- 
lfr
0/0

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux