Re: The future Fedora Copr "rolling" chroot cleanup policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 10:21 AM Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Dne 15. 07. 24 v 2:57 odp. Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
>
> Instead of always keeping "Rawhide" around as a separate buildroot,
> why not just rename it at Branching and then create a NEW Rawhide
> chroot?
>
> 1) Different workflow compared to the one we have in Fedora.

How do you mean?

>
> 2) Create it with what? Empty content ("why you are forcing be to rebuild everything")? Copy everything (you end up in the same situation)? Rebuild packages from previous rawhide (what if it fails to build? what if it succeed but no one uses it anyway?).

Let me flip it around: how did you create "Fedora 40" when Rawhide
branched for that? I'm just saying to do it the other way around.

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux