On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 04:56:03PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 9:37 AM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1992935 > > > > A new version of ocamlbuild (Fedora: ocaml-ocamlbuild) was found. > > However the version isn't 4.02.3, but 0.15.0: > > > > https://github.com/ocaml/ocamlbuild > > > > and upstream-release-monitoring didn't reopen the bug (maybe for the > > same reason that it found the "new" version is the same as the "old" > > version so it didn't need to open it?) > > > > Ideas here? > > It looks like the GitHub repo has some old tags (for a different > versioning scheme?): > https://github.com/ocaml/ocamlbuild/tags?after=0.10.1 > > Those are larger versions than the "latest". release-monitoring > doesn't sort them by date but by rpm-version-sort. Oh I see ... ocamlbuild was originally a part of the compiler and so used that versioning scheme before which explains the 4.02.* tags. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
