On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 07:10 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 20.10.2005, 18:35 -0700 schrieb Toshio Kuratomi: > >[...] > >3) We integrate these modules in Extras. > > Just out of curiosity: Can squashfs or unionfs build as a module > without patching the core kernel? > Damn, good catch. unionfs requires no patching but squashfs is a little entangled and requires patching the kernel in order to build. So unionfs is a good candidate for Extras but squashfs needs Core support. > http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraExtrasSchedule > > Task Name, Owner, Priority, Target Date, Notes > Kernel module standardization, ThorstenLeemhuis, 1, soon, Good discussion underway, will continue to drive forward > [...] > > Might take some more weeks but we're getting somewhere. Stay tuned on > the usual mailing list, but give us some days to sort everything out. Ah great! I'll watch for further postings from you, then :-) -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
