Re: Guidance on individual packages requiring x86_64-v2 baseline ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 11:51 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
<dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> If you mean Extended Page Table here

Yes, I used a shorthand term, since I am apparently
too steeped in the architectural details.

> I don't know any way to tell if my Cedar View Atom D2550 CPU from 2012
> supports it or not. Not that I'd want to run QEMU on it.

I don't think it does, but if you really want to know,
you can always go to Intel's processor model
site (ark), and look for line of the form:
  "Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)"
for your processor (if it is not there, the answer
is no, if it is there you have it), or just look at
/proc/cpuinfo and look for "ept" in the vmx flags.

>
> +1. Just build it with --target x86_64_v2 and announce it widely
>

That should probably be the most reasonable
path forward (allowing those that want to
step up to propose and build their qemu-slower-is-better
package to do so).
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux