On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 07:37:15AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> said: > > I think I've convinced upstream to change their approach to make their > > recent changes a compile-time opt-in, to allow build time choice of the > > non-optimized code, rather than forcing it on everyone. So hopefully > > we don't need todo anything in Fedora now. > > Since this seems to be performance related, any chance Fedora can > provide both a baseline and a x86-64-v2 version, maybe with a wrapper to > automatically choose the correct verion? I really don't want to get into the business of maintaining multiple parallel builds of the same binaries in one package. If Fedora cares about optimal performance it should just declare we're going to stop being held back by compat with ancient hardware and use -v2 baseline for everything, but obviously that's been rejected previously. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
