On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 10:36:25AM -0500, Michel Lind wrote: > Dear all, > > Just a heads up that the legacy libgee06 package is FTBFS for > F40/F41: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261317 > > and only has one dependent, libfep: > > ``` > ❯ fedrq whatrequires libgee06-devel > libfep-0.1.0-24.fc40.src > > ❯ fedrq whatrequires libgee06-devel -b f39 > libfep-0.1.0-22.fc39.src > > ❯ fedrq whatrequires libfep-devel -b f39 > ibus-fep-1.4.4-23.fc39.src > libskk-1.0.4-12.fc39.src > ``` > > Since libfep itself has dependents, I checked and it looks like it does > not actually need libgee06 (or libgee) - or not anymore - and rebuilding > it with the BR dropped succeeds with virtually the same Requires and > Provides in the generated RPMs: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libfep/pull-request/1 > > I'm cc:ing the libfep maintainers; if I don't hear back in a few days > I'll merge and build this and retire the package. > libfep PR merged and built: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=118960744 I have retired libgee06 in Rawhide. Best regards, -- _o) Michel Lind _( ) identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
