On 04. 06. 24 8:21, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2024-06-04 at 13:39 +1000, Ian Laurie via devel wrote:
On 6/1/24 1:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2024-05-31 at 13:36 +0200, Jiri Konecny wrote:
To my knowledge it shouldn't be. Fedora Workstation is already running
on Wayland by default for quite some time and even Live ISO is already
Wayland. To my knowledge Wayland don't have issues with graphics cards
in general.
GNOME has a fallback mechanism where it automatically runs the X.org
session if the Wayland session doesn't work. I believe that is active
on the live image. Of course, as telemetry is evil, we have absolutely
no idea how many Fedora users actually hit this mechanism.
One comment I would make is that VirtualBox doesn't *properly* support
Wayland [yet] requiring GNOME to be run as an Xorg session (of course
not an issue for Xfce etc).
If Anaconda is to be Wayland, my concern is that it may make all DEs
uninstallable, even ones like Xfce far removed from Wayland.
Looking at the change, it's not totally clear to me, but it looks like
this is actually mainly about how anaconda is run in the installer
environment - netinst, server DVD, and ostree installer images. It's
not about live images.
I *think* anaconda would continue to run as an X app if launched from a
live desktop running on X. But it would be nice to have that clarified
in the Change scope, and any changes to how it would behave in such an
environment.
Is it better now? I tried to extend the Scope section of the change.
Best Regards,
Jirka
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
