Hi Panu,
On Monday, 2024-06-03 15:55:09 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> %{_buildrootdir} is nothing packages should be referring to, in any
> circumstance really. It's a potentially shared directory among arbitrary
> packages (in the traditional it's ~/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/ ) and putting
> anything there can conflict with other packages being built on the system.
> %{buildroot} is what packages should be referring to,
So using %{buildroot} instead of %{_buildrootdir} would be an actual
replacement?
> or better yet, ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}.
Why better?
> That said, these cases kinda appear to be something not intended to be
> packaged at all, just "I need to put this file somewhere". That's one of the
> many use-cases we introduced the intermediate %builddir in 4.20, under which
> the %{buildroot} itself is.
But that's _only_ available as of 4.20, so not in f39,f40, correct?
Eike
--
GPG key 0x6A6CD5B765632D3A - 2265 D7F3 A7B0 95CC 3918 630B 6A6C D5B7 6563 2D3A
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
