Re: LLVM Packaging Ideas for Fedora 41

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 3:42 PM Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

My point is that we can spent time maintaining llvm00 - llvm99 packages
or we can spent time adjusting upstream projects to be compatible with
the latest llvm.

There are many projects that require a fair amount of work to be ported to newer llvm versions, take intel-igc for example ( https://github.com/intel/intel-graphics-compiler ) where there is now more than a year long process to slowly get it to llvm 16 (yeah, that's not a typo).

--

Best regards / S pozdravem,

František Zatloukal
Senior Quality Engineer
Red Hat
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux