Re: Smaller buildroot for Perl packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 13. 05. 24 17:11, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
Hi -

I also did a test rebuild of all packages directly build-requiring
systemtap-sdt-devel and identified these packages that really need the
dtrace script: [...]
(The logistic challenge there will be side-tag rebuilding all those
after a systemtap subrpm split.)

I don't understand why that would be necessary. Could you please explain why
do you believe it would?

OK, build-time dependency changes may not need the side tag but do
need a spec update to prevent a FTBFS at next build.

Only those packages that actually need dtrace would require changes. Such changes could land gradually as needed.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux