Re: SPDX Statistics - L'Aigle meteorite edition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 10. 05. 24 v 11:47 odp. Gary Buhrmaster napsal(a):
Unless the BZs force a package to be
updated you may very well end up with
~20% of the Fedora packages nearly
forever not being updated with proper
SPDX licenses as they are as likely or
not going to be forever be on re-build
auto-pilot (thanks to the mass rebuild(s)).

My intentions, is that from that moment going forward, we can assume that all packages will have license in SPDX format.

And we can build a tooling that will work with SPDX only. If the package license tag was not in SPDX format (It is bug, we have plenty of them already across whole Fedora Linux) then it will be harder for you to work with the tooling. I.e.

-- 
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux