Re: Feedback wanted: Testing side-tag for switching dnf5 in Rawhide

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 6:14 PM Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I don't believe GNOME Software enforces this. (There was some debate about
> whether doing two updates in a row was really useful, if I remember.) That
> may be a big source of pain.

As I recall, *much* of the time it does not matter, but
if someone has not kept up with updates the upgrade
programs themselves might be too old to properly
complete the update (such as if dnf-command(system-upgrade)
or rpm needed to be updated).  In some previous
versions a blocker for release did require that fixes
be made available for previous versions for successful
updates.  While I follow the philosophy of updating
regularly, there are likely some who install Fnn, and
never update, and then would expect an update to
Fnn+2 to work without issue(s).
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux