* Andrea Bolognani: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 08:19:41AM GMT, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 02:21:56PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: >> > > What cases aren't covered by the symlink? We have a full, working >> > > Fedora/RISC-V distro using it at the moment. >> > >> > The symbolic link isn't in the buildroot. >> >> This is indeed a problem. The symlink should be moved from glibc to >> filesystem. I don't know why we put it in glibc, historical anomaly I >> guess. I'll prepare a couple of PRs today which will have to be >> carefully pushed in a single side tag to fix this. > > Shouldn't the symlink point in the opposite direction anyway? > /usr/lib64/lp64d is the actual canonical path, /usr/lib64 is just for > compatibility. > > Though apparently (see elsewhere in the thread) Gentoo does it this > way too, so maybe there's something I'm missing that makes the > current direction more desirable. It's simply not possible to have a symbolic link in the other direction. Thanks, Florian -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
