On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 08:19:41AM GMT, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 02:21:56PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > What cases aren't covered by the symlink? We have a full, working > > > Fedora/RISC-V distro using it at the moment. > > > > The symbolic link isn't in the buildroot. > > This is indeed a problem. The symlink should be moved from glibc to > filesystem. I don't know why we put it in glibc, historical anomaly I > guess. I'll prepare a couple of PRs today which will have to be > carefully pushed in a single side tag to fix this. Shouldn't the symlink point in the opposite direction anyway? /usr/lib64/lp64d is the actual canonical path, /usr/lib64 is just for compatibility. Though apparently (see elsewhere in the thread) Gentoo does it this way too, so maybe there's something I'm missing that makes the current direction more desirable. -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
