Re: convert everything to rpmautospec?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 6:58 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 12:56 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 09:41:01AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > >
> > > Dne 08. 04. 24 v 10:43 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> > > > And we already have a significant fraction of packages using rpmautospec,
> > >
> > >
> > > Actually, could you quantify the "significant fraction"?
> >
> > 7399 / 23912 = 31%.
> >
>
> How much of it is non-Rust and non-Go?

There's ~3000 Rust packages, 99.9% of which use rpmautospec, so you
can subtract about 3000 from that number.

Fabio
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux