Re: convert everything to rpmautospec?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun Apr 7, 2024 at 15:15 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> I think it's time to switch to rpmautospec completely.
> Thus, the proposal:
> - new packages MUST use rpmautospec
> - packagers SHOULD convert their packages
> - provenpackagers MAY convert existing packages
>   (e.g. when they want to push some fix or separately from other
>    work)
> - people submitting pull requests against src.fp.o MAY also
>   include a conversion in the pull request and packagers SHOULD
>   merge it.

I happily use rpmautospec for the Go and Rust libraries I maintain that
are simple, mostly autogenerated packages, but I otherwise prefer using
manual changelogs. They allow me more control over the changelog and
maintain the separation between the developer commit log and the user-
facing changelog that I keep for the rest of my projects. I understand
the merits of rpmautospec, but I would very much not like to be forced
to use it for all my packages.
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux