On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 9:22 PM Leon Fauster via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Am 07.04.24 um 17:15 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I'm revisting the topic of rpmautospec because I was doing some work > > on various packages, and it's annoying that some packages are using > > rpmautospec and others are not. > > > > All my packages have been converted, so in day-to-day work, I don't > > even think about %changelog. When working with other packages, I'll > > forget to update the Relase and/or %changelog. Today I was rebasing > > some pull requests in pagure, and the _only_ conflicts that I had were > > about Release and %changelog. > > > > I think it's time to switch to rpmautospec completely. > > Thus, the proposal: > > - new packages MUST use rpmautospec > > - packagers SHOULD convert their packages > > - provenpackagers MAY convert existing packages > > (e.g. when they want to push some fix or separately from other > > work) > > - people submitting pull requests against src.fp.o MAY also > > include a conversion in the pull request and packagers SHOULD > > merge it. > > > > (FTR, 'rpmautospec convert' does the conversion, incl. the commit > > to dist-git. Manual conversion should not be used.) > > > IIRC - EPEL8 is not ready for this? It is. I have been building rpmautospec-enabled packages for EPEL8 for a while. Here's an example that hasn't been garbage collected yet, and you can see intact changelog: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2338209 Fabio -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
