Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 9:46 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 25. 03. 24 7:48, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
> Also botan got orphaned despite the FTI going away
> <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259559> [1] ;-(
> Could it be un-orphaned back?

> [1] Seems FTI failed to close the bug fixed on 2024-03-07

It was closed after it was fixed. The update was stuck at beta freeze and
nobody associated the FTI bugzilla with it.

No, it was reported installable (comment 5) on 7th March by fti-bugs but was not closed as it should have been then.
Then it was orphaned (comment 6) on 21st March.
Then again reported installable (comment 7) on 25th which actually closed the bug.
Which is why I am asking if the orphaned can be reverted, please.

Jens

--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux