Re: Obsoleted packages in F40

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I just upgraded my workstation to F40 and it surprised how many packages were reported by `remove-retired-packages`.
> There was lots of orphaned packages - there is nothing to do about them. But there was lot of packages that were removed 
> intentionally. See the list at the end of my email.
>
> I want to highlight that we have policy for removing policy
>     https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Retirement_Process/#complete_removal
> which at the end mention adding the package to
>     https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-obsolete-packages

Thanks for raising this. It was not clear to me these cases should be
completely removed.
I created a PR hoping to make it clear:
https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/package-maintainer-docs/pull-request/151

-- 
Tulio Magno
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux