Dne 21. 03. 24 v 19:47
kloczek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx napsal(a):
Those trivial substs probably would cover +90% of all packages in time in my estimation.
See
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QVMEzXWML-6_Mrlln02axFAaRKCQ8zE807rpCjus-8s/edit#gid=0
The "trivial" conversion is possible for 4996 license tags (you do not want to count packages, you need to count License tags). Out of 11k. That is 45%. For the remaining 55% you have to actually check the text of the license. Or use license scanner.
Currently in Fedora is 23ish k packages so to review with greater care ~2.5k lets say 30-50/day as afk/warming-up task each day should take for single person top few weeks .. not years. And because it would be done by single person I'm sure that he/she will be improving that task during that applying better and better methodology ans sometimes tools. In that approach I'm 100% sure that quality of that review will far greater than with spreading that task to all possible maintainers. Issue only is that this can be done OLNY by proven packager because submission PRs/discussing/etc will eat order of magnitude more time to someone without such permission.
Do I understand it correctly that you are willing to help? I will
help you get the proven packager status and onboard you to current
state and availale tooling.
-- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
