V Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 12:09:27PM +0100, Ralf Corsépius napsal(a): > Am 16.02.24 um 12:00 schrieb Ralf Corsépius: > > Hi, > > > > today, mock-core-configs-40.1-1.fc39.noarch landed, bringing along > > > > /etc/mock/fedora-40-x86_64.cfg > > and > > /etc/mock/fedora-40-i386.cfg > > > > Now, I'm wondering about config_opts['package_manager'] > > > > fedora-40-*.cfg includes templates/fedora-branched.tpl > > which sets > > config_opts['package_manager']=dnf > > > > This is unlike fedora-rawhide-*.cfg which sets > > config_opts['package_manager']=dnf5 > > > > I.e. all fc40 packages having been built before fedora-40*.cfgs were > > introduced, were using "dnf", while packages being built from now on > > will be using "dnf" > > Typo: This was meant to be > "... were using "dnf5", ... will be using "dnf". > > > Shouldn't fedora-40*.cfgs set config_opts['package_manager']=dnf5 ? > > Good catch. F40 packages are suppossed to be built with dnf5 <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/40/ChangeSet#Build_Fedora_with_DNF_5>. I believe Koji uses mock configs from Koji build tag configuration instead those provided by mock-core-configs. If locally run mock is expected to mimich Koji as much as possible, it should change fedora-40*.cfg to use dnf5. -- Petr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
