Doubts on /etc/mock/fedora-40-*.cfg

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

today, mock-core-configs-40.1-1.fc39.noarch landed, bringing along

/etc/mock/fedora-40-x86_64.cfg
and
/etc/mock/fedora-40-i386.cfg

Now, I'm wondering about config_opts['package_manager']

fedora-40-*.cfg includes templates/fedora-branched.tpl
which sets
config_opts['package_manager']=dnf

This is unlike fedora-rawhide-*.cfg which sets
config_opts['package_manager']=dnf5

I.e. all fc40 packages having been built before fedora-40*.cfgs were introduced, were using "dnf", while packages being built from now on will be using "dnf"

Shouldn't fedora-40*.cfgs set config_opts['package_manager']=dnf5 ?

Ralf
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux