On 06.02.24 8:50 AM, Marc-André Lureau
wrote:
Hi On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 8:52 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 05:34:06PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:Hi, could someone in the mingw team look at mingw-libgsf / libgsf (please see the bug forwarded below)? If I see right, then the standalone mingw-libgsf package should be retired as there are mingw builds from the regular libgsf package, which seems to be regularly updated.Copying Marc-André who added the mingw sub-RPMs to the native package. The mingw-libgsf should have been retired on rawhide, as soon as the libgsf native had a successful build with mingw packages. At this point I guess it'll need retiring on both rawhide and f39Correct, I missed that. Geg, Sandro, can you retire the mingw-libgsf package?
I've retired the package, but not sure if it worked 100% as I'm not listed as package admin.
Sandro
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
