On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 05:34:06PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > Hi, > > could someone in the mingw team look at mingw-libgsf / libgsf (please > see the bug forwarded below)? If I see right, then the standalone > mingw-libgsf package should be retired as there are mingw builds from > the regular libgsf package, which seems to be regularly updated. Copying Marc-André who added the mingw sub-RPMs to the native package. The mingw-libgsf should have been retired on rawhide, as soon as the libgsf native had a successful build with mingw packages. At this point I guess it'll need retiring on both rawhide and f39 > > > Thanks, > > Dan > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2024 00:09:44 +0000 > From: bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [Bug 2066129] mingw-libgsf-1_14_52 is available > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066129 > > Upstream Release Monitoring > <upstream-release-monitoring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Summary|mingw-libgsf-1_14_51 is |mingw-libgsf-1_14_52 is > |available |available > > > > --- Comment #8 from Upstream Release Monitoring > <upstream-release-monitoring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Releases retrieved: > 1_14_52 Upstream release that is considered latest: 1_14_52 > Current version/release in rawhide: 1.14.48-7.fc40 > URL: http://www.gnome.org/projects/libgsf/ > > Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to > a stable branch: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ > > > More information about the service that created this bug can be found > at: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring > > > Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be > packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember > that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that > the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally > problematic items have been added upstream. > > > Based on the information from Anitya: > https://release-monitoring.org/project/1980/ > > > To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mingw-libgsf > > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066129 > > Report this comment as SPAM: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202066129%23c8 > -- > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
