-------- Messaggio originale -------- 31/01/24 22:27, Alessandro Astone <ales.astone@xxxxxxxxx> ha scritto: > I can support that. > > But am I supposed to ignore the fact that kkofler is already bullying the KDE SIG into not breaking that one other package they maintain that occasionally breaks on kde updates? See example: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-977de87584 > > Am I going to have to see kkofler rant in every plasma update that their xorg stack breaks? > -- Firstly, let's not make personal attacks. The reported example refers to an update submitted for a stable release, where every effort in order to not to break things must be made. Was that happened before the side-tag update was pushed? imo, saying "blogilo is dead upstream and you're the only one left using it" is not enough. Mattia -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
