libavif-1.0.3 built in f40-build-side-82609. Proceeding with rebuilds...
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 11:37 AM Frantisek Zatloukal <fzatlouk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
--On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 11:23 AM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 11:14:04AM +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
> In about a week (after mass rebuild before branching), I'll start
> with bumping libavif in rawhide from 0.11.x to 1.0.3
> ( https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ libavif/pull-request/2 ,
> soname bump from 15 to 16).
I'm confused .. Wouldn't it be better to do this after branching?
Otherwise you're introducing an SONAME bump into the stabilising
Fedora 40.I would prefer to have this in F40 too (not to block gamescope rebases (which do require libavif >= 1.0) there for the lifetime of the F40 release), and, this isn't a big of a risky rebase in my opinion (there will be more impactful and riskier rebases coming far later in the cycle, such as LLVM rebase, again, in my opinion).Best regards / S pozdravem,František ZatloukalSenior Quality EngineerRed Hat
Best regards / S pozdravem,
František Zatloukal
Senior Quality Engineer
Red Hat
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
