Re: [rawhide] libavif soname bump

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 11:23 AM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 11:14:04AM +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
> In about a week (after mass rebuild before branching), I'll start
> with bumping libavif in rawhide from 0.11.x to 1.0.3
> ( https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ libavif/pull-request/2 ,
> soname bump from 15 to 16).

I'm confused .. Wouldn't it be better to do this after branching?
Otherwise you're introducing an SONAME bump into the stabilising
Fedora 40.

I would prefer to have this in F40 too (not to block gamescope rebases (which do require libavif >= 1.0) there for the lifetime of the F40 release), and, this isn't a big of a risky rebase in my opinion (there will be more impactful and riskier rebases coming far later in the cycle, such as LLVM rebase, again, in my opinion).

--

Best regards / S pozdravem,

František Zatloukal
Senior Quality Engineer
Red Hat
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux